From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Mar 02 2010 - 07:29:31 CST
<announcements at unicode dot org> wrote:
> The Unicode Consortium is revising the Unicode Standard Annexes for
> eventual release of Unicode 6.0. A standard part of our development
> process is to open all of the annexes for public review.
I'm curious what the benefit is of creating a new revision of *all*
UAXs, including those which have not changed. I quickly scanned a
sample of four of the documents under review, and three of them (24, 29,
34) have no change except for boilerplate and copyright date (sometimes
rendered as "20010," BTW). I know integers are cheap, but is this just
a matter of following protocol or is there another benefit?
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 02 2010 - 07:35:50 CST