Re: Roman Character Fragments

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Sat May 15 2010 - 10:38:03 CDT

  • Next message: Andrew Miller: "Re: Language info for U+1E1C and U+1E1D"

    Christoph Päper <christoph dot paeper at crissov dot de> wrote:

    > Considering the CJK Ideograph Fragments thread, do you think that
    > someone could successfully (and therefore should) propose to encode
    > the building blocks of the roman alphabet?
    > I ask because some scholars have shown that our letter forms are not
    > completely arbitrary.[Primus2004] Someone might want to write about
    > these featural components, someone else might want to create a new
    > systematic letter based upon them. Both would need some, perhaps
    > differing sort of encoding support.

    Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |
    RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ ­

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2010 - 10:42:01 CDT