RE: Hexadecimal digits

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:40:48 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Reply: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Luke-Jr" <luke at dashjr dot org> wrote:

>> Shouldn't this be an FAQ?
>
> If it's Frequent, shouldn't that imply there's enough people who want
> it to warrant inclusion in Unicode? ;)

It means there are enough people who are misinformed about whether a
universal character encoding should be a tool to advance individuals'
social reforms.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s

Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Reply: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:42:41 CDT