Re: Hexadecimal digits

From: Hans Aberg (haberg-1@telia.com)
Date: Sat Jun 05 2010 - 11:23:58 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"

Previous message: Peter Zilahy Ingerman, PhD: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 5 Jun 2010, at 16:33, Otto Stolz wrote:

> You may wonder, why I am using the term “hexadekadic”.
> This is because, “hexadeka” is the Greek word for 16, ...

The URL <http://translate.google.com/#en|el|sixteen> produces
δεκαέξι, or dekaexi.

Hans

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Previous message: Peter Zilahy Ingerman, PhD: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 05 2010 - 11:26:01 CDT