Re: Hexadecimal digits

From: Mark Davis ☕ (mark@macchiato.com)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2010 - 12:24:37 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"

    This topic is not particularly relevant to Unicode. Could people please
    carry on this discussion on a different list? There are internet groups
    devoted to hexadecimal and other topics (eg the adoption of Shavian by the
    United Nations) where communities of like-minded people can be found.

    Mark

    — Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —

    On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:22, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

    > On Tuesday 08 June 2010 10:53:15 am John Dlugosz wrote:
    > > Yes, when discussing values in hex, this is an English problem. What do
    > I
    > > call the useful higher powers and groups? What is the equivalent of
    > > "thousands" or "millions" to refer to powers of 65536 or 4294967296?
    >
    > Seriously, these questions are all answered in the book...
    >
    > (written using "classical" hexadecimal digits)
    > 0=Noll 1=An 2=De 3=Te 4=Go 5=Su
    > 6=By
    > 7=Ra 8=Me 9=Ni A=Ko b=Hu C=Vy
    > d=La
    > E=Po F=Fy 10=Ton 100=San 1000=Mill 1,0000=Bong
    > 1,0000,0000=Tam 1,0000,0000,0000=Song 1,0000,0000,0000,0000=Tran
    > 2,8d5b,7E0F=Detam, memill - lasan - suton - hubong, ramill-posanfy
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 08 2010 - 12:28:04 CDT