From: Andreas Prilop (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2010 - 12:00:37 CDT
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Mark Davis wrote:
> I'll overlook the lack of civility, since I can understand
> that kind of frustration when something doesn't work.
Well, I am aware of this problem/bug for many years now:
Over the years I tried again and again and again to write
to Google, for example with such forms as
But nothing happened.
How to file a bug report with Google?
> This is the first I've heard of this as a problem with Google Groups.
> I filed a bug against Groups for this issue; I'll see what they find out.
> BTW, does the same thing happen if you send your email in UTF-8?
No. On the contrary, groups.google tries UTF-8 always:
This messages contains Latin-2 characters with charset=ISO-8859-2.
> The problem with slavishly following the charset parameter is
> that it is often incorrect.
I wonder how you could draw such a conclusion. In order to make
such a statement, there must be some other (god-given?) parameter,
which is the "real charset".
Each and every program (webbrowser, newsreader, e-mailer ...)
reads the charset parameter and displays the document
(webpage, e-mail message, news message) accordingly.
Do you really think that the author of a webpage or message
will not notice?
Do you really think that all these programs (including
the author's tools) render the document incorrectly
and only Google knows better?
How do you come to this conclusion?
I admit that the situation is different with the LANG
attribute in HTML. That's because writing, e.g.
has almost no practical implications and the text
might well be French.
But when we have charset=ISO-8859-7 , all of the author's
programs (I believe) will display the document in Greek.
How can you think that only Google knows better
to "correct" this into charset=ISO-8859-1 ?
You can still make your guesses when a charset parameter
is completely missing.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 01 2010 - 12:06:53 CDT