RE: Indian Rupee Sign (U+20B9) proposal

From: Erkki I Kolehmainen (
Date: Mon Jul 19 2010 - 05:22:49 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Indian Rupee Sign (U+20B9) proposal"


    I should have thought that the Indian rupee issue is important enough to
    warrant a proposal of its own instead of it being muffled by a totally
    unrelated and highly questionable request for a glyph change. That way the
    crisp proposal could also have been forwarded to all relevant parties
    without bringing into their special attention a past instance where the
    homework (on a currency symbol!) had not been done properly. I suspect that
    you combined them for the express purpose of possibly getting the drachma
    issue for discussion in a more positive connection.

    Sincerely, Erkki

    -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
    Lähettäjä: []
    Puolesta Michael Everson
    Lähetetty: 19. heinäkuuta 2010 11:10
    Vastaanottaja: unicode List
    Aihe: Re: Indian Rupee Sign (U+20B9) proposal

    On 19 Jul 2010, at 08:22, Erkki I Kolehmainen wrote:

    > Incidentally, I would have preferred to have the two proposals (in both
    WG2 N3862 and L2/10-249) separated.


    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 19 2010 - 05:26:10 CDT