Re: CSUR Tonal

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@telia.com)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2010 - 02:16:23 CDT

  • Next message: Petr Tomasek: "Re: ISO 15924 update"

    Den 2010-07-26 02.48, skrev "Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org>:

    > superscript letters S, T, b, m, r, s, and t. [...]
    ...
    > Imagine my surprise, then, when I found that these superscripts are not
    > formally encoded (only i and n are). [...]

    There are more superscripted letters than i and n that are encoded; among
    them are:

    1D40;MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL T;Lm;0;L;<super> 0054
    1D47;MODIFIER LETTER SMALL B;Lm;0;L;<super> 0062
    1D50;MODIFIER LETTER SMALL M;Lm;0;L;<super> 006D
    02B3;MODIFIER LETTER SMALL R;Lm;0;L;<super> 0072
    02E2;MODIFIER LETTER SMALL S;Lm;0;L;<super> 0073
    1D57;MODIFIER LETTER SMALL T;Lm;0;L;<super> 0074

    (only missing MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL S from that list at top of the quote
    above)

        /kent k



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 26 2010 - 02:19:36 CDT