From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2010 - 14:43:21 CDT
On 18 Sep 2010, at 20:23, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> Why not use the character that was added to Unicode precisely for the purpose?
Seems like that character needs an annotation, doesn't it?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 18 2010 - 14:45:32 CDT