Re: Proposed Update Unicode Technical Standard #46 (Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing)

From: Markus Scherer (markus.icu@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 22 2010 - 15:21:16 CDT

  • Next message: Martin J. Dürst: "Re: Proposed Update Unicode Technical Standard #46 (Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing)"

    On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Colosi, John <jcolosi@verisign.com> wrote:

    > I think your point is that UTS #46 has a broader scope than just
    > registries, and so it allows the Unicode 6.0 mapping. In fact, it’s very
    > purpose seems to be a bridging of the gap between 2003 and 2008. So in a
    > trivial sense, a strict reading of Idna2008 for registries will cause some
    > issues.
    >

    Yes, IDNA2008 breaks compatibility with IDNA2003 and its many deployed
    implementations. UTS #46 is an attempt to combine the useful upgrades which
    IDNA2008 makes while maintaining compatibility as much as possible.

    Please see the Introduction (section 1) of UTS #46; also, in section 2 it
    says:

    *Symbols and Punctuation. *UTS #46 supports processing of symbols and
    punctuation during the transitional period. The transition will be smooth:
    as registries move to IDNA2008 the DNS lookups of IDNs with symbols will
    simply be refused. At that point, in practice, there is full compatibility
    with IDNA2008.

    Best regards,
    markus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 22 2010 - 15:25:20 CDT