From: Frédéric Grosshans (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Oct 17 2010 - 07:05:25 CDT
Le samedi 16 octobre 2010 Ã 22:36 +0530, Kiran Kumar Chava a Ã©crit :
> At the link, http://geek.chavakiran.com/archives/55 , I tried to
> understand Telugu Unicode encoding and then I tried to do an out of
> box review of this encoding. Kindly let me know if I am missing
> something, mentioned as missing in above article are really missing or
> not. Any other views...
The 13 Telugu characters added in Unicode 5.1, including the fractions,
are enumerated here :
The rationale for their inclusion are documented in
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3116.pdf (which proposed 18
characters) . I have not looked close enough to check whether the 5
"missing" characters are linked to the one you consider as missing.
-- FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans ChargÃ© de Recherche Laboratoire de Photonique Quantique et MolÃ©culaire ENS Cachan / CNRS UMR 8437 tel: (+33)1 47 40 77 15 GSM: (+33)6 09 24 29 64 e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 17 2010 - 07:10:13 CDT