From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Oct 30 2010 - 18:06:45 CDT
If you want to write SMS emoji novels, that may be a concern. For occasion use in SMS, or for non-SMS use, I don't think there's much of a concern.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Shachar Shemesh
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 2:00 PM
To: Leonardo Boiko
Cc: Deborah Goldsmith; Ed; Don Osborn; Unicode Mailing List
Subject: Re: Best smart phones & apps for diverse scripts?
On 30/10/10 02:45, Leonardo Boiko wrote:
> Only UTF-16 though, which brings SMSâ€™s already appaling low 160/140
> character limit to a measly 70.
Sorry for going off topic here, but this means that new emoji
(emoticons) code points for Unicode 6.0.0 are going to be very costly, being as it is that they are in the UTF-16 surrogate area..... This might actually risk adoption, IMHO.
-- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd. http://www.lingnu.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 30 2010 - 18:11:01 CDT