From: Markus Scherer (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2010 - 19:49:31 CST
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Doug Ewell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm probably missing something here, but I don't agree that it's OK for a
> consumer of UTF-16 to accept an unpaired surrogate without throwing an
> error, or converting it to U+FFFD, or otherwise raising a fuss.
Various degrees of "fuss", including subsitution with U+FFFD or similar, are
perfectly normal options for error handling.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2010 - 19:52:08 CST