From: Markus Scherer (markus.icu@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 05 2010 - 15:42:53 CST
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> Right, but as I said, those downstream tasks shouldn't be consumers of
> UTF-16 code units anyway. They should be consumers of Unicode code
> points, which by definition excludes loose surrogates.
>
Code points include surrogates. Maybe you mean "UTF-32 code units" or
"Unicode scalar values".
markus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 05 2010 - 15:44:54 CST