Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?

From: Johannes Rössel (
Date: Thu Nov 11 2010 - 05:47:26 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"

    (Ok, I messed up a bit, the signature for an encoding itself should
    probably be something like seq BYTE → CHAR to allow for UTF-8 or UTF-16
    properly; the simplistic ℕ → CHAR doesn't suffice for all encodings.
    Nevertheless, my point should still stand)


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 11 2010 - 05:50:05 CST