Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

From: Martin v. Löwis (martin@v.loewis.de)
Date: Sun Nov 28 2010 - 18:06:57 CST

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"

Previous message: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Telugu vs Kannada confusables"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Well, some may disagree with me, but my first advice would be
> to avoid macros like that altogether. And second, to absolutely
> avoid any use of wchar_t in the context of processing Unicode
> characters and strings.

So how do you denote string constants using that approach?

Regards,
Martin

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Previous message: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Telugu vs Kannada confusables"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 28 2010 - 18:11:57 CST