Re: Playing cards....

• Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Playing cards...."
• In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Next in thread: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Reply: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 18:41 +0100, Karl Pentzlin a écrit :
>
> CF> Since there are two empty rows in the Playing Cards block (1F0A0
> CF> 1F0FF) would it be worth adding symbols for five and six suit
> decks?
>
> They are intended for the 21 trump cards (atouts) and the Fool
> (l'excuse)
> of the French Tarot playing card set, see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_tarot

Why have this 22 cards be omitted in the first encoding ?

        Frédéric

-- 
Frédéric Grosshans
Chargé de Recherche
Laboratoire de Photonique Quantique et Moléculaire
ENS Cachan / CNRS UMR 8437
tel: (+33)1 47 40 77 15
GSM: (+33)6 09 24 29 64
e-mail: frederic.grosshans@ens-cachan.fr

• Next message: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Playing cards...."
• In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Next in thread: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Reply: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Playing cards...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 16 2010 - 12:38:45 CST