From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2011 - 16:15:54 CST
On 6 Jan 2011, at 21:58, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Steve Slevinski <slevin at signpuddle dot net> wrote:
>> The Internet Draft is for reference. It should progress to an RFC.
> What is the objective of publishing this as an RFC, if a Unicode proposal is already being prepared? Text encodings used to be presented in RFCs during the '80s and '90s, but that approach is much less common today.
Like Egyptian, display of SignWriting characters will be handled with higher-level protocols.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 06 2011 - 16:18:21 CST