From: Frédéric Grosshans (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jan 29 2011 - 08:01:54 CST
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 Ã 01:38 -0800, Asmus Freytag a Ã©crit :
> The localizability aspect won't help your argument here, because
> has rejected earlier, and much more modest proposals for localizable
> numeric punctuation, the *Decimal Separator* which would have been
> equivalent to Period of Comma depending on locale. Unicode's mandate
> therefore explicitly excludes localizable content.
Just out of couriosity, when was it proposed/rejected ? I do not find
the rejection in http://www.unicode.org/alloc/nonapprovals.html , where
I think it would fit nicely.
-- FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans ChargÃ© de Recherche Laboratoire de Photonique Quantique et MolÃ©culaire ENS Cachan / CNRS UMR 8437 tel: (+33)1 47 40 77 15 GSM: (+33)6 09 24 29 64 e-mail: email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 29 2011 - 08:06:17 CST