From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2011 - 11:23:45 CST
> Encouraging users to use the shortest form (like UTF-8) is not the
> same as syntactically not providing a non-shortest form (like UTF-16
> and -32).
Minor correction: the syntactic definition of UTF-8 does now exclude
byte combinations that would encode non-shortest forms, though of course
they are still obvious and easy to create.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 28 2011 - 11:27:33 CST