From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Mar 10 2011 - 14:20:37 CST
On 10 Mar 2011, at 21:07, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:28:13 pm Michael Everson wrote:
>>> The problem is that it seems to no longer be maintained--still missing any mention of the proposed Tonal encoding I submitted about 4 months ago using the E9D0-E9EF range.
>> Oh. That wasn't a ConScript, so it was out of scope.
> The dictionary disagrees.
The dictionary doesn't run ConScript.
A set of extensions to the European digits does not constitute a constructed writing system.
> Quite frankly, this response, in addition to being in the wrong forum (the actual submission going completely ignored) looks like an excuse for a personal closed-mindedness.
This discussion is extra specially closed now.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 10 2011 - 14:24:00 CST