Re: Case mappings

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Sun Mar 13 2011 - 15:55:01 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Case mappings"

    Philippe Verdy wrote:

    >> Modifying all existing electronic text to include such an invisible
    >> control character,
    > Why all texts ? This was not in the proposal.

    >> and requiring all users and processes to enter it reliably,
    > Why all users ? Here again not in the proposal. In fact all
    > characters are encoded for an undefined number of users, possibly
    > small, but not for all users. The existence of the character would be
    > there for those users for whom the difference does matter.

    If users or processes who want to take advantage of this special
    character cannot depend on it being there in all texts, it may as well
    not be there at all, as they will have to fall back on the same
    heuristics that they are trying to avoid.

    In any case, I'd best get out of the business of telling users like QSJN
    UKR that such-and-so character would be a bad idea or that Unicode will
    not encode it, even if that is what I personally believe.

    Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA |
    RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s 

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 13 2011 - 15:57:19 CST