Re: Proposal for Combining Up Tack Above

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Apr 06 2011 - 17:15:02 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Proposal for Combining Up Tack Above"

    On 6 Apr 2011, at 22:56, Leo Broukhis wrote:

    > There is no mention of this possibility in the proposal nor any justification as to why the proposed character must be represented by a single character.

    Because David sees it as a single fused glyph. I agree with him.

    >> I don't know anything about the proposed character, but somehow I doubt that it's fundamentally a composite.
    > FWIW, a named character sequence can be added for it.


    > Under magnification, it looks like a true tack rather than a combination of a macron and a vertical line. Is that a satisfying condition for encoding?


    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 06 2011 - 17:17:13 CDT