Michael Everson wrote:
> There's also such a thing as over-unification, though.
Right, and I'm not arguing for or against unifying Unifon with Latin, or
indeed for or against encoding it at all. I just don't think the glyph
variations Christoph was describing were tantamount to hiding totally
different characters behind a font hack.
Perhaps the use of the term "smart font" was unfortunate, as it might
evoke the type of Latin/Greek hack Karl mentioned.
I do worry about encoding even more letters that are intended to look
identical to Basic Latin letters, because of the spoofing issue.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell Received on Mon Jul 04 2011 - 10:08:03 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 04 2011 - 10:08:03 CDT