From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:19:46 +0100

On 21 Aug 2011, at 02:44, Doug Ewell wrote:

> Would that really be a better default? I thought the main RTL needs for the PUA would be for unencoded scripts, not for even more Arabic letters.

Could easily be for work on new Arabic-script orthographies which use new letters. Or for similar scripts that treat numbers as Arabic does.

> (How many more are there anyway?)

No one knows. :-)

Michael Everson *
Received on Sun Aug 21 2011 - 03:23:46 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 21 2011 - 03:23:48 CDT