Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> I don't buy the assumption that all the world is either AAT, Graphite
>> or Uniscribe.
>
> Nobody asserted that either. It is only pointed out that major
> implementations are able to provide what you seek.
The distinction between what is permitted by Unicode and what is
available in major implementations is not always being observed in this
thread.
> The request being made to allocate BC=R areas in the PUA is sure to
> generate an impression that conformant implementations should consider
> such a property normative, which then would violate the definition of
> the PUA that conformant implementations need not treat any property of
> the PUA as normative.
This is a tough nut to crack. Statements are already being made here to
the effect that the default BC property for PUA is normative.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 09:41:53 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 09:41:54 CDT