From: Joó Ádám <>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:25:55 +0200

> True -- so if someone wanted a PUA script to be handled properly in sorting
> etc one would have to prepare collation tables which would obviously go
> *outside* the font.

If a proper definition of an unencoded script needs additional
properties which cannot be stored in the font anyway, why would you
want to store part of it in OT tables? It’s just not the right place.
Fonts’ sole purpose is to display already defined characters, not to
define them. Tails shouldn’t be made wagging dogs.

Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 12:28:04 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 12:28:05 CDT