Re: Noticed improvement in the Code chart link

From: Shriramana Sharma <>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:53:20 +0530

On 10/13/2011 09:47 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> I'd like to have an opinion about why this chart (for example)
> describes two code points 09E4 and 09E5 as<reserved>, without
> assigning any glyph, but still associating them with other punctuation
> signs in another script. Are these positions permanently reserved for
> the case where specific danda signs would be later discovered and
> encoded specifically in this script ? OR are they really unassigned
> and usable for encoding later any other kind of character ?

They are for potential script-specific danda signs and closed to other
kinds of characters.

Shriramana Sharma
Received on Thu Oct 13 2011 - 12:28:16 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 13 2011 - 12:28:18 CDT