Re: Hittite cuneiform

From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:11:39 +0000

On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:49, Raymond Mercier wrote:

> I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me that a separate listing of the Hittite usage is appropriate.

The value of "c" is [k] [s] [ts] [tʃ] [ʔ] and so on.

> Compare the CJK signs: the Japanese -kun and -on readings are included in unihan along with the Chinese readings.

Oh... you'd like annotations to the names list?

Michael Everson *
Received on Sat Dec 17 2011 - 11:16:35 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 17 2011 - 11:16:37 CST