James,
you might want to review (at least) the OFL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIL_Open_Font_License, a license specifically
created for fonts, created with freedoms in mind. In several respects it
fits fonts much better than GPLv3.
/Sz
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 18:12, James Kass <jameskass_at_att.net> wrote:
> I rather would stick with GPLv3, simply because more permissive license
> threatens freedom. For example, someone may take over my fonts, develop
> them further, and subsequently change their license to something
> commercial-only. It is what I want to avoid. Just something like stories
> known from MACOS X, initially Berkeley-licensed-software derivative,
> finally commercialized product.
>
>
> James Kass
>
Received on Sat Feb 04 2012 - 03:54:02 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 04 2012 - 03:54:03 CST