Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

From: Szelp, A. Sz. <>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:49:35 +0100


you might want to review (at least) the OFL:, a license specifically
created for fonts, created with freedoms in mind. In several respects it
fits fonts much better than GPLv3.


On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 18:12, James Kass <> wrote:

> I rather would stick with GPLv3, simply because more permissive license
> threatens freedom. For example, someone may take over my fonts, develop
> them further, and subsequently change their license to something
> commercial-only. It is what I want to avoid. Just something like stories
> known from MACOS X, initially Berkeley-licensed-software derivative,
> finally commercialized product.
> James Kass
Received on Sat Feb 04 2012 - 03:54:02 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 04 2012 - 03:54:03 CST