Re: Unicode, SMS and year 2012 - SQU, not UQU

From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:46:14 +0100

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:55:00 +0100
Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:

I wrote:
 
> With SCSU that avoids Unicode mode and UQU whenever possible, most
> alphabetic languages work fairly well.

I meant:

"With SCSU that avoids Unicode mode and SQU whenever possible, most
alphabetic languages work fairly well."

UQU only occurs in Unicode mode, and escapes tag bytes. SQU does not
use a window for a character, but passes it as 2 bytes of following
data. Of course, an initial byte-order mark may be emitted using SQU;
this has only a small impact on performance.

Richard.
Received on Sat Apr 28 2012 - 13:47:46 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Apr 28 2012 - 13:47:47 CDT