Re: Mandombe

From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:46:34 +0100

On 9 Jun 2012, at 23:58, Doug Ewell wrote:

> Michael Everson wrote:
>> we would want to see some practical examples of how and where it is in use by more than the inventor.
> Yes, but that's true for all proposals, isn't it? Otherwise Ewellic would qualify.

Not really. We have lots of "rarely" used characters encoded. The question here is: Since Mandombe is intended for modern, living use, but is extraordinarily complex, is it like other neo-scripts and will it be subject to modification after use?

Michael Everson *
Received on Sun Jun 10 2012 - 02:52:42 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 10 2012 - 02:52:48 CDT