It has been a feature of the UCS for two decades, was probably part of ISCII.
On 8 Jul 2012, at 14:14, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Richard Wordingham
> <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> On the contrary, doubling for (historical) retroflexion is a fairly
>> clear convention.
>
> Where, please? I have never heard of it. (But of course my knowledge
> is limited.)
>
> --
> Shriramana Sharma
>
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Received on Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:30:55 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:30:56 CDT