Markus brought to my attention that the clause didn't capture what the UTC
decided; he's been out of town, and we're meeting tomorrow to go through
all the issues.
------------------------------
Mark <https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033>
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Richard Wordingham <
richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Are the collation tests meant to have been updated for the change in
> the draft of Step 2.1 of the collation algorithm? I haven't changed
> what I believe to be a UCA 6.1.0-compliant implementation, yet my code
> now passes the 6.2.0 tests for both DUCET and CLDR root. (I understand
> that the error in one of the UCA 6.1.0 tests has been reported on my
> behalf.)
>
Received on Sun Jul 08 2012 - 16:12:18 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 08 2012 - 16:12:19 CDT