Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON

From: Christoph P�per <christoph.paeper_at_crissov.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:25:23 +0200

Leif Halvard Silli:

> * that the DIVISION SIGN in the (human) mathematical notation of
> at least one language (Norwegian) functions as a stylistically
> distinct MINUS sign.

Ain’t that a stylistic, glyphic (i.e. font-dependent) variant of ‘⁒’ U+2052 Commercial Minus Sign, not a special use of ‘÷’ U+00F7 Division Sign?
Received on Tue Jul 10 2012 - 13:26:55 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mahesh T. Pai: "Re: Sinhala naming conventions"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: RE : ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
Maybe in reply to: Leif Halvard Silli: "Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 10 2012 - 13:26:55 CDT