Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON

From: Asmus Freytag <>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:23:28 -0700

On 7/12/2012 2:47 PM, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2012, at 22:20, Julian Bradfield wrote:
>> But wanting to do so would be crazy. My mu-nu ligature is, as far as I know, used only by me (and co-authors who let me do the typesetting), and so if Unicode has any sanity left, it would not encode it.
> Is it in print?
>> My colleagues in the Edinburgh PEPA group did try to get their pet symbol encoded (a bowtie where the two triangles overlap somewhat rather than just touching), but were refused; although that symbol now appears in hundreds of papers by dozens of authors from all over the world.
> If so, then it should be encoded.


can you cite title or number of the original proposal document?

Received on Thu Jul 12 2012 - 20:24:57 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 12 2012 - 20:24:57 CDT