> I have seen this documented many times, though I can't say for sure
> that it was in official Unicode literature.
Excellent, so let's have someone state whether it's in the official
Unicode literature.
And independent of whether it is or not, I know that some mention of the
content of this discussion would be useful exactly below the table here
http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom4
as, for example, a note stating that a little-endian UTF-16 could
conceivably also start with FF FE 00 00. To clarify to the programmer
one more detail about BOM by itself not being a perfect heuristic.
Stephan
Received on Sun Jul 15 2012 - 20:31:54 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 15 2012 - 20:31:54 CDT