Re: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?

On 7/20/2012 1:34 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2012-07-20 20:19, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>
>> On 7/20/2012 8:41 AM, Karl Pentzlin wrote:
>>> Looking for an example of "plain text" which is obvious to anybody,
>>> it seems to me that the "Subject" field of e-mails is a good example.
>>
>> By common convention, certain notational features have been relegated to
>> styled text. Super and subscript in mathematical, chemical and other
>> notation belongs to that class.
>
> I’m afraid I don’t quite follow.

Yeah, I think in this case you missed the point of what I was trying to say.

A./
Received on Fri Jul 20 2012 - 17:21:02 CDT