RE: Missing geometric shapes

From: Murray Sargent <murrays_at_exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:53:15 +0000

Mark E. Shoulson <mark_at_kli.org> wrote: Mirroring tends to be done for glyphs that are used in *pairs*,
open/close things and such.

Not invariably; consider the integral and summation. They don't have mirrored counterparts and many other mathematical symbols don't either.

Murray
Received on Thu Nov 08 2012 - 18:55:40 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stephan Stiller: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"
Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"
Next in thread: Stephan Stiller: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"
Reply: Stephan Stiller: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Missing geometric shapes"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 08 2012 - 18:55:41 CST