Re: latin1 decoder implementation

From: Buck Golemon <buck_at_yelp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:41:55 -0800

latin1 explicitly doesn't define characters (or control codes) in those
ranges, but unicode does.
It doesn't directly follow that decoding a byte in those undefined ranges
produces a unicode-point of equal value.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:

> To no avail? Iím not sure why your colleagues would not believe the
> statement taken right out of the standard, or the mapping file taken from
> the Unicode Web site, but would believe the Wikipedia article.
>
> If they think there is a mismatch, where do they think it is?
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
> http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell ≠
>
>
Received on Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:42:42 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:42:42 CST