Re: Basic Latin

From: Markus Scherer <>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:22:11 -0800

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <> wrote:

> Then again, Latin is no different from Cyrillic, Greek, or Arabic, for
> example, in this respect. In an apparent attempt to save space, the script
> names are also links to basic blocks of characters for the scripts. This
> would not be my cup of tea, but I can well understand the reasoning behind
> this. Using “Basic Latin” etc. as lower-level items would have been more
> logical here, but not necessarily more practical.

The page has been modified to add an alias for Basic Latin (ASCII) under
the Latin heading.
Received on Wed Jan 02 2013 - 16:24:33 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 02 2013 - 16:24:33 CST