> >> what does that different from the RLI
> >> U+2067/PDF U+2068? if it is the same, can we use U+2066 in HTML
> replacing
> >> "<bdi>"?
>
> Code points 2066, 2067, and 2068 are unassigned. I presume you mean
> U+202B RIGHT-TO-LEFT EMBEDDING (RLE) and U+202C POP DIRECTIONAL
> FORMATTING.
No, actually, I think he was referring to U+2066..U+2069. Those are the new bidi format controls that have been approved for Unicode 6.3, and which are related to the extensions of the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm for isolate runs under discussion for UAX #9 for Unicode 6.3. See PRI #232:
http://www.unicode.org/review/pri232/
and in particular:
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/tr9-28.html#Explicit_Directional_Isolates
--Ken
Received on Tue Jan 15 2013 - 19:04:23 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 15 2013 - 19:04:24 CST