Re: Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?

From: Ian Clifton <ian.clifton_at_chem.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:22 +0000

"Costello, Roger L." <costello_at_mitre.org> writes:

[...]

>
> So why would one ever generate text in decomposed form (NFD)?
>
Some authors—naïve ones perhaps—might use composing accents because it’s
easier for them to remember a handful of useful composing accents than
the much larger number of combined forms.

[...]

-- 
Ian ◎

Received on Fri Feb 01 2013 - 08:33:10 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: suzuki toshiya: "Re: [unicode] Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?"
Previous message: Costello, Roger L.: "Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?"
In reply to: Costello, Roger L.: "Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?"
Next in thread: suzuki toshiya: "Re: [unicode] Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 01 2013 - 08:33:11 CST