Re: Why wasn't it possible to encode a coeng-like joiner for Tibetan?

From: Shriramana Sharma <>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:46:07 +0530

Would the encoding of a subjoined consonant series have been considered
bright then? Curious.

When we don't have a problem with subjoined forms of Kannada, Telugu and
Grantha being represented using a virama despite also being taught that
they are "vattu"-s (equivalent to coeng) what exacerbating circumstances
exist in the Cambodian situation?

Sent from my Android phone
Received on Fri Apr 12 2013 - 06:20:50 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 12 2013 - 06:20:52 CDT