Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)

From: Matt Ma <matt.ma.umail_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:14 -0700

Hi,

U+0F76 is a non-spacing combing mark (Mn) but its combing class value is
defined as 0. Is this expected? The specialty of the character is that it
is a composition of two combining marks, U+0FB2 and U+0F80.

Same question goes for U+0F73, U+0F75, U+0F77, U+0F78, and U+0F79.

Thanks and regards,
Matt
Received on Fri May 17 2013 - 18:24:25 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Bing now translates to/from Klingon"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)"
Reply: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)"
Maybe reply: Matt Ma: "Re: Regarding canonical combing class value for U+0F76 and similar characters (Unicode 6.2.0)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 17 2013 - 18:24:26 CDT