Re: Code point vs. scalar value

From: Stephan Stiller <>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:21:27 -0700

Instead of selectively agreeing with Philippe's writing, it would be
good to tell us why Glossary claims that surrogate code points are
"[r]eserved for use by UTF-16" and why there are similar statements in
the Unicode book if
> [AF:] [o]nce you add the UTF-prefix, you are, by force, speaking of
> code units.

Received on Wed Sep 18 2013 - 21:23:47 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 18 2013 - 21:23:49 CDT