Re: Pali in Thai Script

From: Mark E. Shoulson <>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:15:50 -0400

On 03/27/2014 10:59 PM, Richard BUDELBERGER wrote:
>> Message du 28/03/14 03:34
>> De : Mark E. Shoulson
>> A :
>> Objet : Re: Pali in Thai Script
>> It's not at all uncommon. Consider Yiddish, which is essentially German
>> written in Hebrew script. Or various Judeo-Arabics written in Hebrew,
>> and the Talmud, which is Aramaic written in Hebrew letters (in pretty
>> much every printing and MS I've heard of).
> (What you call « Hebrew letters » are Aramaic letters of the alphabet adopted by Hebrew in Vth c. BC.)

Of course. And the Samaritans still write both Hebrew and Aramaic as
well using truly _Hebrew_ characters (ktav ivri, though of course
developed by them through history), not the Aramaic-derived ones. But
Aramaic is more associated with various Syriac alphabets. Still, I was
reading Aramaic for a long time before I even knew there were Syriac
alphabets that people wrote Aramaic in, and I still can't particularly
read those.

I think I've seen colloquial Arabic in Hebrew letters (aimed at teaching
Hebrew-speakers, to be sure; maybe mostly to avoid having to teach a new
alphabet). Someone once sent me a proposal for writing Esperanto in
Hebrew letters (yes, Aramaic, of course: square Hebrew, ktav ashuri.
What Unicode calls "HEBREW"), to what purpose I don't know (it was more
or less the same as Yiddish writing). Sanskrit is also often seen in
various scripts, I believe.

I don't think it's unusual to find one language written in a script
generally associated with another, especially if the first language
doesn't have a well-established script for itself (not all the above are
examples of that).

Unicode mailing list
Received on Thu Mar 27 2014 - 22:16:52 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 27 2014 - 22:16:52 CDT