Singhala scirpt ill defined by OpenType standard

From: Naena Guru <naenaguru_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:52:48 -0500

Here is the proof that OpenType standard defined the Singhala script
wrongly. Also find a BNF grammar that describes it.
http://ahangama.com/unicode/index.htm

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Thu Apr 03 2014 - 21:54:10 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Koji Ishii: "Re: Emoji [And crash in the Web interface to the mailing list]"
Previous message: Buck Golemon: "Re: Emoji [And crash in the Web interface to the mailing list]"
Next in thread: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Singhala scirpt ill defined by OpenType standard"
Reply: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Singhala scirpt ill defined by OpenType standard"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Singhala scirpt ill defined by OpenType standard"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 03 2014 - 21:54:11 CDT