We try not to do that. There are some known holes, like RBNF. if you know
of others please file a ticket.
On Apr 21, 2014 9:18 PM, "Doug Ewell" <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
> From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
> > In general, I heartily dislike "specifications" that just narrate a
> > particular implementation...
> I agree completely. I see this with CLDR as well; there is a more or
> less implicit assumption that I will be using ICU to implement whatever
> is being described. I don't care how robust and well-tested a wheel is;
> as a developer, I should be able to use the specification to reinvent it
> if I like.
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
> http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell
> Unicode mailing list
Unicode mailing list
Received on Tue Apr 22 2014 - 01:58:54 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 22 2014 - 01:58:54 CDT