On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:19:57 -0700
Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On this side show, Philippe finally is correct, because I received
> his message without ASCII-i-fication; he cc'd me directly, and I
> never saw the mangled text. It's a bit embarassing for a Unicode mail
> list to not even be able to let guillemets through unmolested.
Are you sure it's the mail list that did the mangling? As I got the
post, it had two parts, plain-text in ISO-8859-1, with '<<' and '>>'
substituted for the guillemets '«' and '»', and HTML, also in
ISO-8859-1, with character entities « and ». I suspect
Philippe's e-mail client may be at fault.
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Thu May 01 2014 - 17:45:55 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 01 2014 - 17:45:56 CDT